<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: America’s Civil War: March 2010</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bullrunnings.wordpress.com/2010/01/07/america%E2%80%99s-civil-war-march-2010/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bullrunnings.wordpress.com/2010/01/07/america%e2%80%99s-civil-war-march-2010/</link>
	<description>A Journal of the Digitization of a Civil War Battle</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 19:21:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Evans</title>
		<link>http://bullrunnings.wordpress.com/2010/01/07/america%e2%80%99s-civil-war-march-2010/#comment-16145</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Evans]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 04:51:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bullrunnings.wordpress.com/?p=6313#comment-16145</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Looks really interesting. I know about the round and round with the roman numerals. I always find it interesting they are constantly used in Civil War books. I wonder exactly when and why the roman numerals became in vogue? 

On your comment about Lincoln it reminded me of something the historian William Manchester said about him in the beginning of his bio on MacArthur, &quot;Lincoln is still misjudged. As Edmund Wilson has pointed out, the Civil War figure to whom Americans are introduced as children, and whom Carl Sandburg did so much to perpetuate, has little in common with the cool, aloof dictator who ruled this country unflinchingly as the sixteenth President of the United States. MacArthur shared Lincoln&#039;s monumental will to win...&quot;

Thanks,
Chris]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks really interesting. I know about the round and round with the roman numerals. I always find it interesting they are constantly used in Civil War books. I wonder exactly when and why the roman numerals became in vogue? </p>
<p>On your comment about Lincoln it reminded me of something the historian William Manchester said about him in the beginning of his bio on MacArthur, &#8220;Lincoln is still misjudged. As Edmund Wilson has pointed out, the Civil War figure to whom Americans are introduced as children, and whom Carl Sandburg did so much to perpetuate, has little in common with the cool, aloof dictator who ruled this country unflinchingly as the sixteenth President of the United States. MacArthur shared Lincoln&#8217;s monumental will to win&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Chris</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
